Saturday, September 24, 2011

"Person of color" = someone discriminated against for their race/ethnicity on a systematic level by the white majority


(Inspired by the commentary on this post)

For the purposes of anti-racism struggles, that’s all you need to go by.

Yes, the term, “colored” is not normally associated with Asian people these days, but it was definitely used to label people of Asian descent in this country in the past. We have been and still are the targets of White racism:




Believing the fallacy that people of Asian descent are not authentically or legitimately ‘Colored’ or ‘People of Color’ is wrong because:

1) It ignores the long history of racial discrimination and persecution of Asians in the U.S. (e.g. the Chinese Exclusion Acts, the Japanese-American internment during WWII, explicit campaigns to drive Asians out of the American West, the lynching of Asian Americans. (Which is something that is not commonly known due to the fact that many Asian and Mexican victims of mob violence in the 19th c. were classified as ‘White’ in official records*)


2) It ignores the history of White European imperialism in Asian countries, which intersects with White racism against Asian immigrants in White-majority countries. I assure you that White imperialists certainly did not view Indians, Chinese, or Vietnamese as being anything other than ‘Colored’


Imperial map of Asia, source of map

European man receiving pedicure from South Asian servants

White European man receiving a pedicure from South Asian servants

3) It plays into the White racist divide-and-conquer strategy.

Even a brief look at the history of race/ethnicity in U.S. law alone makes it apparent that a key aspect of White racism has been the classification of non-Whites according to (white-defined) categories.

Those hailing from Asia (as well as the Middle East, the Caribbean, and Latin America) have been legally categorized in a myriad of ways—very occasionally as White, but more often as non-White (e.g. Ozawa v. United States, United States v. Thind). In general, Asians have occupied a strange ethno-racial limbo as ‘Other’ (e.g. the Census prior to 1870). As far as Whites were concerned, Asians might not have been ‘Negros’, but we certainly weren’t White either. Our otherness made us targets for discrimination and violence, and—because our right to citizenship has constantly come under attack—we’ve historically had as little recourse to the protection of the law as African Americans have.

Massacre of the Chinese at Rock Springs, Wyoming

Massacre of the Chinese at White Springs, Wyoming (source)

Yes, Asian people have (somewhat more recently than you think) enjoyed certain perks due to our ethnicity/race compared to Black and AmerIndian people (e.g. ‘the model minority’). But that’s just a more recent aspect of the divide-and-conquer strategy, which the White hegemony has used to pit minorities against each other so as to distract us from the real problems facing our communities.

And yes, some Asian people are complete racist dicks to those who aren’t Asian or White, but that’s internalized White racism. If you’ve been kicked and beaten by your master for years, then suddenly given a few scraps from his table, would you throw them in his face? Or is it more likely that—as beaten down as you are—you’d give in to Stockholm Syndrome and play along? (To be clear: that’s an explanation for Asian racism, not an excuse.)



Even so, incidents of Anti-Asian bias (e.g. Vincent Chin, Wen Ho Lee) and straight-up racist violence occur frequently enough these days that Asians are hyper-aware of the fact that many—including non-whites—don’t view us as Americans, let alone ‘Colored’. We’re simply foreign ‘others’.

So if White is grudgingly treating you OK, while Black and Brown seem to hate and distrust you, then whom do you ally yourself with? More importantly, who benefits from this apparent alliance?

In the American black-white paradigm of race relations, ‘others’ like Asians get shit on no matter which side we’re on. So the Asian internalization of White racism makes a twisted kind of sense as a survival strategy, particularly if your natural allies (other victims of White racism) are treating you like foreigners and even equating you with the oppressor himself. 

My point: Asians’ conflicted, sometimes tense, relations with African Americans and those who have been historically, categorically considered ‘Colored’ is an artifact of White racism. This means that if you exclude Asians from ‘Colored’ solidarity against White racism, you are reproducing a highly successful strategy of White racism.

Let that sink in for a minute.


To conclude: Anti-Asian exclusion from POC solidarity movements is ignorant, wrong, and just plain stupid. Asians’s current role as a prop of White racial supremacy is not our doing, just as our historic role as the foreign ‘Other’ is not our doing. The peculiar place of Asians in race relations today has been the result of the intersection of White racism, xenophobia, and imperialism. It is a mistake to think otherwise.  

TL;DR: Questioning the identity of Asians as “people of color” reinforces White racial supremacy.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011


Last night my school had an “International Welcome Party”, which I thought was pretty self-explanatory. When I told some people about it, their response was - I kid you not - “Oh, well I’m not very international” or “But I’m not an international student”. SMH. I really question whether college will help some of these people. 

On another note, I ran into some Arab international students I had met before and some I hadn’t and I sat with them for awhile. This made me realize just how much I need to practice my Arabic. Or maybe it was just the fact that I never had very many Egyptian friends. Anyways, the conversation very quickly turned to politics (for my non-Arab and/or non-Muslim followers, most Arabs’ and Muslims’ conversations are centered around politics). It was the first time in a long time that I actually felt comfortable just discussing politics, but, more importantly the first time in a long time I felt comfortable, as a woman, voicing my opinions in a mixed setting. I’m not naive enough to assume that my experience is the same as all Arab or Muslim women. I do think it is important to note, however, that while I was in the Middle East, I never felt that my opinion was devalued because of my gender (because of my age, maybe, but never my gender). It wasn’t until yesterday that I really realized how societal expectations of women in the US have impacted my personality. In the last two years I can count on one hand the number of times I openly discussed my political views, and it was mostly among family and close friends. And when it wasn’t around people close to me, my opinion was dismissed - at least until a guy reiterated what I had just said.

Anyways, aside from maybe pointing out how messed up the world can be, I’m not really sure what the point of this post is, so I’ll stop rambling.


Tuesday, August 23, 2011


Making posters with Jack Layton’s inspiring farewell message

(Source: politicsartandstuff)

Saturday, August 20, 2011 Tuesday, August 9, 2011
You know what you’re saying is important when the power structure brings in people who look like you and think like them.

Gloria Steinem: The Future of the Fight for Women’s Rights - The Daily Beast (via saramess)

Worth reading twice.

(via rachelhills)